patching...
Welcome back, Patch Blogger!

Christie Talks Tenure Reform at Freehold Town Hall Meeting

Governor Chris Christie focused on education and took on teachers unions during a visit to Monmouth County Tuesday.

 

With only 54 days left until the New Jersey state budget is passed, Gov. Chris Christie suggested education reform as a way to decrease taxes, in a town hall meeting in Freehold.

Hundreds of New Jersey residents gathered at the Freehold National Guard Armory for a town hall meeting where Christie discussed his plan to decrease the state’s budget. According to Christie, New Jersey spent $25 billion supporting public schools during the 2009-2010 school year, an average of $17,836 per student.

“That is the most of any state in America, per pupil,” Christie said. “I am a product of public education, but I support good public education. I support public education that makes our children's futures bigger and brighter and stronger, and I will no longer protect a public education system that wastes your money and wastes your children’s future.”

Christie criticized what he characterized as excessive spending for priority school districts.

“Fifteen percent of the total state budget goes to 31 school districts," he said. "I am tired and I think you are tired of paying a king’s ransom for failure, and so we need to reform the tenure system."

Continuing on the topic of tenure reform, Christie emphasized the need to assess job performance throughout a teacher's career.

“We need to reform the tenure system because nobody in this state should be guaranteed a job after three years and one day on the job with no regard to how well they do the job," said Christie. "If you do a great job, we want you to stay in teaching as long as you want. But if you are ineffective, we need to get you away from the front of that classroom and on to something else.”

Christie suggested implementing merit-based salary increases for teachers who are achieving in the classroom. “Like everyone else in America that does well, you should be paid better for achieving,” he said.

Christie also recomended a voucher system so that parents can remove their children from a district that is not working for them.

The New Jersey governor then focused his attention on the teachers' union. 

"You need a union as good as you are, and you don't have one," he said in a conversation with a teacher in the audience.

Christie said he is fed up with what he characterized as the union's desire to keep the status quo. "I am no longer going to put up with them telling us what is best for our students," he said.

"The teachers' union would have you believe that somehow, if teachers compete with teachers for merit-pay, that somehow this would ruin comaraderie. I find that hard to believe," said Christie. "Teachers don't become teachers to become rich."

Watch video of residents questioning Gov. Christie.

Related Topics: Education, Gov. Chris Christie, Town Hall Meeting, and tenure reform

Marc LeVine

11:18 am on Wednesday, May 9, 2012

Governor Christie:

While you were in the neighborhood, did you happen to inquire about how you could help the Freehold Borough Schools with their lack of funding, space and critical resources, despite their heavy burden on our taxpayers?

Reply
Comment_arrow

Joe

4:25 pm on Wednesday, May 9, 2012

No, but I will, send back the illegals Marc! They took over your entire little town without even a white flag being raised by you!

Comment_arrow

Joe

4:26 pm on Wednesday, May 9, 2012

wait, here's another idea, merge with the Township! two many ideas at once?

Comment_arrow

Joe

4:27 pm on Wednesday, May 9, 2012

why should we the taxpayers bail out your failure?

John Connor

6:04 pm on Wednesday, May 9, 2012

Who can take Christie seriously when Klienberg is sitting behind him in the bleachers?

Reply

John Connor

6:05 pm on Wednesday, May 9, 2012

I heard the Dean's were ther too.

Reply

joe smith

1:12 am on Thursday, May 10, 2012

I agree with Christie on tenure, its failing our chidren. Union contracts say we cant fire LEMONS (bad teachers) and so you have the lemon dance, principals swaping teachers amongst schools, the Dance of the Lemons. Tenure does not allow us to get rid of lousy teachers. We need to make distictions among teachers but the unions disagree. There are 23 steps to remove a failing teacher, its impossible with forms and dates. The Unions are major obstacles to real reform. Then there are seniority contracts that allow senior teachers to stake a claim on positions over junior teachers sacrificing good teachers for bad teachers. We see it with charter schools that are a threat to unions and their public schools. Unions have used their power in policitcal process to prevent too many of these charter schools meanwhile there are huge waiting lists for them. Unions insist to pay teachers based on years on job not productive teacher. If there are layoofs due to budget cuts, due to tenure, the newest hires are let go even if you are the best teacher of the year, too bad, your gone. The unions put a cap on charter schools in NY, they try to prevent them.

Reply

Jeff Rossi

8:22 am on Thursday, May 10, 2012

I'd say for the most part, the teachers that I've seen in my town all do an excellent job. Do some need some coaching to improve their teaching practices-of course, but I don't see any I'd consider lemons. I have friends who work in public schools who I know are rock star educators-and it's frustrating to me that their results are not rewarded adequately. That said, all teachers would benefit from a system where there are more private sector-like performance management practices in place. The teachers who are the top performers will get rewarded for it, and through the appropriate programs their skills and competencies will get recognized as the best means to educate our children. If the lower performers can't succeed in the classroom, then there needs to be a clear path to get them out of the classroom. It doesn't mean they have to leave public education, it just means they have to do something that’s better suited to their talents. But if someone needs to be fired, then there needs to be a means to do that without being bureaucratic in nature. There's too much at stake. In the private sector, if I under perform, my company can lose a few dollars (ok, that's understating it a bit), but whatever happens to the company will be absorbed. In public education, an under performing teacher left to under perform can affect generations of people. Maybe that's a bit of an overstatement, but in the extreme you have kids moving through life with a gap in core skills and knowledge.

Reply

Jeff Rossi

8:23 am on Thursday, May 10, 2012

Private sector practices that focus on human capital management, such as talent acquisition, talent development and performance management need to be brought into the schools. Yes, the schools do all of that, but in a way that unions have influenced in order to provide protection to the members. The protection afforded members by the union in this case undermines their whole reason for existence (worker protection) in that it negatively impacts their client base or in private sector terms, their customers (aka the students). The unions need to allow school systems the latitude to onboard talent who have the appropriate skills and intrinsic motivation, the ability to nurture that talent as necessary and within budget, and to provide adequate incentives aligned with appropriate performance measures. The union excuse of "that won't work here" is a closed minded view that is hurting everyone associated with the public education system. It’s time to come to the table with an open mind and make some cutting edge changes in our school system.

Reply

Patrick Roy,AIA,PP, Architect & Planner

10:19 am on Thursday, May 10, 2012

Don't just bust the Unions which helps the teachers maintain their devotion to teaching our young including their respect and dignity, improve upon it to benefit, the schools, their teachers and the communities at large and cut the blubber.

Reply

lyn roberts

11:28 am on Wednesday, May 23, 2012

Now if all teachers really did have a "devotion to teaching" this would not be an issue!!

Reply

Leave a comment