Dear Board of Education Members,
I am sorry that I am unable to attend the next meeting of the Board, but I would like to share my thoughts on your proposal to put police in every school in our district.
First, I applaud you for your concern for the safety of our students. I know this is a difficult time for every parent, teacher and administrator, and it is good to see you are taking everyone’s concerns to heart. I have a difficult time accepting, however, that the proposal is a good one – for the students and teachers, or for the community at large.
We must face the fact that perfect safety is impossible to guarantee, whether in our schools, our homes or our world. Accidents happen, and terrible people exist; there is nothing we can do to change those realities of nature. Having an armed guard or officer in every school might give the impression of safety, but it will do very little to increase it.
For this proposal to work, we would also need to remove the glass from any outside door, since as we saw in Newtown, someone with a gun could shoot their way through any door, even if it is locked. We would probably need to remove all the classroom windows, too, as they could be shot out to gain entrance as well. Then we would need to end outside recess and physical education, as those students are completely vulnerable to an attack from far beyond the school’s walls.
But to be really safe, we would also need to put armed guards on each school bus. And at each bus stop, where kids wait for the bus.
Then our town will have to address the problem of supermarkets and stores where our kids congregate. And our churches and temples, too. And the rec centers, and…
If our district has the money to pay all these police officers, couldn’t we, instead, hire more teachers? I have to believe that every student in our town would benefit every day from smaller classes, more personal attention and perhaps even enough teacher-student interaction to be able to recognize a student in trouble and get help before he or she decides to go on a killing spree.
I know that you have our best interests at heart. But please, take the time to consider the true effect of your proposal. If we make our schools into jails, complete with armed guards, we will have created an entirely new problem. We cannot protect our children from everything, but we can protect them from fear by showing them that we are not afraid. Ben Franklin said it best: “They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety.”
Thank you very much for listening.
Sincerely,
Rabbi Donald A. Weber
Kat
4:05 pm on Thursday, January 3, 2013
Ladies and gentlemen please remember at the BoE meeting the Wednesday after the tragic shooting was open floor where they discussed the issues of police officers at schools and parents put there input on the security for our school children. Please remember these are police officers not armed guards. Unfortunately times are changing and this is only a temporary fix till a permenant plan of protection goes into place. I applaude the townships descision. My children who were afraid to goto school now feel more secure and don't cry to get on the school bus. The were not made aware of the newton massacre at home but by others talking so if this is what must be to help them feel safe so be it. We can't protect everyone from every situation but we can try and as a parent I feel that we need to try and help teach our child to be aware of there surroundings and the people in it. I survived 911 and for me our life as a nation changed from that day and now this event will make a change going foward. As a parent we take a vow to protect, love and teach our children. As a country we send our women and men from our armed forces to protect our boards and fellow neighbors what makes this any different if we can't protect on our own soil then as a nation we are weak.
Stephanie Samuels
9:20 pm on Wednesday, February 13, 2013
The quote from Ben Franklin is an interesting one. An interpretation could be that if we the people give up our liberty such as the second amendment which was put into place to protect ourselves from a tyrannical government to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty or safety. If this is correct than there is nothing to protect us from another Holocaust. Here is a documented fact with reference: Tonso, William and David Kopel. "Gun Bans and 'Schindler's List.'". Davekopel.org/2damendment.htm. The Second Amendment Project, a Research Center of the Independence Institute, 24 Aug. 1994. Web. "(Schindler's List) omitted a critical part of the real story: the part where Schindler gives all the Jews semiautomatic rifles. According to Mr. Schindler's wife Maria, when Schindler decided to liberate his Jewish workers, he handed them all semiautomatic weapons so they could fight the Nazis. In today's politically correct Hollywood, Steven Speilberg probably would have ruined his chances for an Oscar by telling the whole story about Oskar Schindler's devotion to freedom."
cynicinmarlboro
6:50 pm on Thursday, January 3, 2013
The Rabbi makes a lot of sense to me. Now I heard that Totowa is having TWO cops in each school for a cost of $200,000, which supposedly they have just lying around.
dancers mom
9:37 pm on Thursday, January 3, 2013
wake up and smell the coffee!! Safety first political agendas and debates later!
Michael Mirkin
11:21 am on Friday, January 4, 2013
If the political agenda is second, then why did the Mayor capitalize on parents fears at the most sensitive time to suggest implementation (all be it temporary) of most controversial solution that is opposed by the majority including our governor? Mayor's supporters were planted in the audience at the meeting to act as catalysts for his plan and the board swallowed it hook, line and sinker. Watch the board meeting video if you disagree.
Guy Montag
10:32 pm on Thursday, January 3, 2013
the cops will not provide anything. it is just another step to a united nations controlled police state. towelheads fly planes into the wtc and now we need to show ID when we go into a building and be tracked everymove we make? Algore and the UN are behind all of this playing you people like puppets.
Lucky Jack
10:54 pm on Thursday, January 3, 2013
Great letter, Rabbi, but when is the last time any board influenced by mob rule came to a logical decision based on common sense and rational thinking? As your good book says, "Men plan; God laughs." I guess we should be grateful that they're not rounding up all of the mentally impaired and putting them in camps, although I'll bet there won't be many more group homes for the mentally ill approved in Marlboro any time soon. The fundamental misunderstanding here is that a deranged killer with a death wish is going to be deterred by a cop who embodies the fulfillment of his ultimate fantasy: to die in a blaze of glory and gunfire. My prediction is that the next time a nut with a final determination to commit suicide by cop is going to know right where to go, but this time he'll be even more determined to take out as many victims as he can in order to create the even greater glory in his sick mind. At Columbine, the two gunmen were leaving the school they had just shot up when they saw the cop who had been stationed there returning from his lunch, whereupon they went right back in and started the shooting all over again.
Stephanie Samuels
7:14 pm on Wednesday, February 13, 2013
School shooters do NOT want suicide by cop. Their exit plan is suicide by their own hands. It is soft targets they want NOT a righteous gun battle. Let them pick another soft target just NOT our schools. Educate well on this topic. Look into Ret Lt. Dave Grossman who is most knowledgeable in this area. I applaud Marlboro Township for doing the right thing not the easy thing. Denial is NOT a strategy.
Stephanie Samuels
tom thornton
7:19 am on Friday, January 4, 2013
Weber, the self proclaimed leader of the Diaspora, is pushing his own Ultra Left Wing agenda. He ran to all the media outlets he could find and gave them copies of his letter. He even put it on his congregational blog. I wonder if his Board of Trustees or the members of the congregations approved of his actions and casting them in a light that is against taking all possible measures to protect our children. Weber is a supercilious bag of wind whose only agenda is to further his personal political agenda, the kids be damned.
If these temporary measures save one child, isn’t it worth it?
Michael Mirkin
12:18 pm on Friday, January 4, 2013
Outside of politics these temporary measures do absolutely nothing. There is no imminent threat and these threats were present before the CT shooting and will be present long after this has faded from our memories. If Columbine (or other shooting events) did not energize this town, BOE or elected officials to take effective and prudent steps to increase school security 20 years ago why is this any different? Please remember that unlike CT, NJ has a strict assault rifle ban in place as well as a stringent limitation in ammunition magazine capacity. This was initially discussed in the first days after the shooting as way to limit collateral damage.
Stephanie Samuels
8:05 pm on Wednesday, February 13, 2013
Before one comments on assault rifles and the size of magazines it should be noted that assault rifles arevfully automatic weapons which WAS not used in Newtown. It was a Buschmaster .223 semi automatic weapon. It makes no difference of the magazine capacity. Reloading takes less than one second. Please look at Susan Gratia Hupp testify before Congress. It is an education we could all use.
Richard Freeman
8:10 am on Friday, January 4, 2013
Rabbi's letter goes to the cost of the Police Officers. If its only a small chance that the presence of these professionals prevent a killing of the students and faculty its worth it. There is no liberty issue here at all. Our schools are meant to provide a safe learning environment. It not a supermarket or shopping mall atmosphere.
DAEBJ
9:04 am on Friday, January 4, 2013
So now there's a price to protect children? Shame on you. In a time where all people do is complain about there not being enough jobs, our town just gave people jobs! My kids didnt even mention the police officer. Police are not suppossed to be scary to kids! Your children should be able to comfortable around police and if they are not well then why did u instill fear? We also need to stop making such a big deal about this because all we are doing is drawing attention to ourselves which is never good!
Jerlena
9:52 am on Friday, January 4, 2013
I agreed 100% PERCENT, HE COULN'T HAVE SAID IT BETTER! LOVE THAT LETTER.
Philip KRAMER
12:25 pm on Friday, January 4, 2013
Rabbi Weber is missing the point. All he has to do is look to Israel and see the importance of security. We as a nation are complacent in dealing with threats both without and within. After 911, for a brief time, we began to see security in NYC in public places. Everybody complained about the intrusion into their privacy, and eventually the security measures ceased.
We have more threats from within. We all are moved by massacres like Newtown and Columbine. So much so, that shootings with only two or three people that occur in public places barely make the news.
We have a serious problem with violence in the US, and we are doing nothing to address it. Our malls and movie theaters are soft targets. As are most of our public places.
IT IS time to think about spending money on our security. The irony is that the same people who complain about conspiracies and control are the people who support unfettered access to guns and assault weapons.
Our wars in Iraq and Afghanistan have accomplished nothing of long term success. We spent trillions of dollars and thousands of lives. As soon as we leave these countries they will go back to being the way they were.
That money would be better spent on making Americans more secure to live their lives here in the US.
Evan Pickus
12:26 pm on Friday, January 4, 2013
I respectfully disagree. If only one child's life is saved by the presence of an armed officer in the schools, the cost is justified. Perhaps an armed officer could not have prevented all of the deaths in Newtown. But maybe the shooter would not have made it so far into the school, saving many of the children and staff members who died. We may not have the capacity to protect every supermarket, every library, every bus in Marlboro- but nine schools where all of our children spend their days? As I said before- if one child is saved, the cost is justified.
Steve R
3:46 pm on Monday, January 7, 2013
So are you willing to cut out school sports, because according to the CDC there is an 800% greater chance of a child being killed in school sports than a shooting at a school. So if this were really about preserving life, statistically speaking, we should eliminate all school sports as that would have a greater efect on the preservation of our children. Yes there is a cost to what we are willing to do to preserve life, people make these decisions everyday. Even look at training for single officer response to an active shooting, it does not say run in with guns a blasing, but it tells a single officer to contain and take cover (from both the FBI and DHS).
Michael Mirkin
12:35 pm on Friday, January 4, 2013
Mr. Pickus; playing devils advocate we can achieve the same without police or armed guard presence. Using Newton as an example the shooter gained entrance to the building by shooting out a glass door; let's replace glass doors with metal or security glass doors. Once inside the building he had unfettered access to the whole building; how about installing security gates inside of the building, putting in video and audio surveillance systems to be monitored by the police dispatch. There are many alternatives and solutions we just need to take the politicians out of the conversation when it comes to safety of our kids. Shame on anyone trying to capitalize on this tragedy for their own political gain.
Evan Pickus
12:57 pm on Friday, January 4, 2013
Mr. Mirkin: We have no such doors or windows in our schools right now, and that type of construction could take the better part of a year. After the appropriate investigations have been made, and recommendations in accordance with those investigations have put into place, perhaps your ideas pertaining to appropriate safety measures will be more cost effective and more palatable. But as it takes a mere few minutes to reassign a police officer juxtaposed against the year it takes to implement the kind of construction you are speaking of, I feel better knowing that we are doing all we can right now. As to your claims about Mayor Hornik's alleged political agenda, I'm not sure where your statistics come from ("most controversial solution that is opposed by the majority,") nor do I have any inclination to believe that he "capitalize[d] on parents fears at the most sensitive time." A situation arose, and he reacted immediately. That's why we have a Mayor. And while, yes, I'm sure there were supporters of this program at the Board Meeting, why do you call them the "Mayor's supporters?" They were supporters of the Mayor's Program, not necessarily of the Mayor. And I think you would be hard pressed to prove that they were "planted."
In closing, let me note that you state that there is no "imminent threat." I'm sure if you asked someone in Newtown the day before the massacre whether there was any imminent threat, they would have said "no" as well.
DAEBJ
2:50 pm on Friday, January 4, 2013
Evan! You are very eloquent and i agree with you! Case well made! Have a great day!
Mel
7:40 pm on Sunday, January 6, 2013
Short term solution: The presence of armed guards at each of our nine schools.
Long tem solution: "If our district has the money to pay all these police officers, couldn’t we, instead, hire more teachers? I have to believe that every student in our town would benefit every day from smaller classes, more personal attention and perhaps even enough teacher-student interaction to be able to recognize a student in trouble and get help before he or she decides to go on a killing spree."
- I think more individualized attention to the students could go a long way. Maybe more guidance counselors as well? Someone should be questioning the ratio of students per guidance counselor at Marlboro High School. Also, the rate of occurrence at which they meet?
- I think our schools should be implementing programs and interactive workshops that will help to promote prosocial skills.